support@magonit.com Request a consultation
Insights — Managed IT

Managed IT vs break/fix support: which is right for a 5–100 person company?

Paying per incident feels cheaper until you count the incidents. Here is how to decide.

Most small businesses start with break/fix IT: something stops working, you call someone, they fix it, you pay. It is simple and it feels cheap. At some point — usually around the tenth employee or the first serious outage — it stops being either. This article explains the difference between break/fix and managed IT, what each really costs, and how to tell when it is time to switch.

How break/fix works

You pay for time, after a problem occurs. The provider has no visibility into your systems between calls and no financial reason to prevent the next call. Responsibility for noticing problems — a failing backup, a server disk filling up, an unpatched laptop — sits with you.

It works reasonably well when you have very few devices, no server, nothing regulated, and can tolerate a day without IT.

How managed IT works

You pay a fixed monthly fee for the provider to operate your IT: monitoring agents on every device, scheduled patching, backup checks, a helpdesk your staff can call, and documentation of the environment. The provider's incentive flips — every incident costs them time, so they are paid to prevent incidents rather than to repair them.

Side by side

AspectBreak/fixManaged IT
You pay forHours, after something breaksA fixed monthly scope
Provider's incentiveMore incidents = more revenueFewer incidents = more margin
Who notices problemsYou (or your staff, when they cannot work)Monitoring, usually before anyone notices
Patching and updatesWhen someone remembersOn a schedule
BackupsAssumed to workMonitored and periodically restore-tested
DocumentationIn someone's headWritten, and owned by you
BudgetUnpredictable — quiet months, then a bad onePredictable
Best for1–5 people, no server, low dependency on IT5–100 people who cannot afford downtime

The hidden cost of break/fix

The invoice is only part of it. The larger cost is the time your team loses: the hour a salesperson spends without email, the morning the accountant cannot open the finance system, the afternoon the owner spends on the phone with a supplier. Multiply that by the number of incidents per year and by salaries, and the "cheap" model is frequently the expensive one.

The second hidden cost is risk. Without monitoring, backups fail silently, updates lapse, and former employees keep access. None of this appears on an invoice until the day it does.

Signs it is time to switch

  • You have more than about 5–10 staff who depend on computers to do their job.
  • You have a server, a line-of-business application, or customer data you could not afford to lose.
  • Someone in your business has become the unofficial IT person and it is eating their real job.
  • You have had one outage that cost more than a month of managed IT would.
  • Nobody can tell you when the last successful backup was — or whether a restore has ever been tested.
  • Your IT costs swing widely from month to month.

What a good switch looks like

Moving to managed IT should not be disruptive. A serious provider starts with an assessment: an inventory of hardware, software, accounts, risks, and recurring costs, written up in a report you can understand. Then they onboard — monitoring agents, backup checks, access review, a support process — while keeping what already works. You should receive documentation of your own environment, and it should belong to you, so that you are never locked in.

A fair test for any provider: ask what happens if you leave. If the answer involves them keeping your passwords, documentation, or domain, keep looking.

Can you keep a break/fix provider for some things?

Yes. Many organizations run a managed agreement for day-to-day operations and still use specialists for specific projects — an ERP consultant, a telecom installer. What matters is that one party is accountable for the environment as a whole and knows what everyone else is doing.

FAQ

Managed IT vs break/fix support: frequently asked questions

What is break/fix IT support?

Break/fix is reactive IT support: you call a provider when something stops working, they fix it, and you pay for the time. There is no monitoring or maintenance between calls, and no financial incentive for the provider to prevent the next problem.

What is the main difference between managed IT and break/fix?

Incentive and visibility. Under break/fix the provider earns more when things break. Under managed IT the provider is paid a fixed fee to keep things working, monitors your systems continuously, and absorbs the cost of incidents — so prevention is in their interest.

At what size should a business move to managed IT?

There is no fixed number, but once you have roughly 5–10 staff who cannot work without IT, or any data you could not afford to lose, the cost of downtime usually exceeds the cost of a managed agreement.

Will switching to managed IT disrupt our business?

It should not. A good provider audits and documents the current environment first, then onboards monitoring, backups, and support with minimal change — keeping what works and fixing what does not, in priority order.

Not sure which model fits your business?

Request a complimentary assessment — a clear report on your current environment and a concrete proposal, with no obligation.